Integrating Remittance Literacy and Village Spatial Policy for Migrant Worker Families: Community Service with PCIM Taiwan

Authors

  • Sri Indarti Department of Public Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia Author
  • Rekho Adriadi Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia Author
  • Rosa Oktapia Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia Author
  • Yela Permata Sari Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59535/4cmpwn06

Keywords:

remittances, migrant worker families, financial literacy, spatial policy, environmentally friendly enterprise

Abstract

Remittances can support household welfare and rural investment, yet productive use of migrant earnings may create new risks when families lack financial capability or information on land-use, environmental, and business regulations. This community service program integrated financial literacy, environmental and village spatial policy socialization, micro-enterprise planning, and family reintegration support for Indonesian migrant workers in Taiwan and their families in home villages. The program was implemented online from January to May 2023 with PCIM Taiwan and involved 30 participants. Five sessions totaling 7.5 contact hours used short expert inputs, case-based discussion, applied worksheets, a business-planning clinic, and family planning activities. All participants completed the financial-literacy pre- and post-test. Across four assessed dimensions, the unweighted composite score increased from 55.5% to 81.5%; the largest gain was in saving orientation and risk awareness (+33 percentage points). Participants also examined environmentally appropriate enterprise options and used a land-use screening guide to connect business decisions with spatial designation, agricultural-land protection, environmental requirements, and business licensing. The program shows that remittance education can be strengthened by moving beyond household finance alone and linking financial decisions to the regulatory and ecological conditions of village investment. Longer-term evaluation is still required to determine whether planned enterprises were established and whether changes in financial and land-use practices were sustained.

 

References

[1] R. H. Adams Jr., “Evaluating the economic impact of international remittances on developing countries using household surveys: A literature review,” Journal of Development Studies, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 809–828, 2011.

[2] C. Dustmann and J.-S. Görlach, “The economics of temporary migrations,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 98–136, 2016.

[3] G. Hugo, “Effects of international migration on the family in Indonesia,” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–46, 2002.

[4] H. de Haas, “Migration and development: A theoretical perspective,” International Migration Review, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 227–264, 2010.

[5] Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning, 2007.

[6] Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, 2009.

[7] Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 41 of 2009 on Protection of Sustainable Agricultural Food Land, 2009.

[8] Government of Indonesia, Government Regulation No. 5 of 2021 on the Implementation of Risk-Based Business Licensing, 2021.

[9] A. Lusardi and O. S. Mitchell, “The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 5–44, 2014.

[10] OECD, OECD/INFE 2020 International Survey of Adult Financial Literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2020.

[11] A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010.

[12] J.-P. Cassarino, “Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited,” International Journal on Multicultural Societies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 253–279, 2004.

[13] M. S. Knowles, E. F. Holton III, and R. A. Swanson, The Adult Learner, 8th ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2015.

[14] D. L. Kirkpatrick and J. D. Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Berrett-Koehler, 2006.

[15] D. McKenzie and C. Woodruff, “What are we learning from business training and entrepreneurship evaluations around the developing world?,” World Bank Research Observer, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 48–82, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

Issue

Section

Short Communication

Similar Articles

21-28 of 28

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.