Development and Validation of a Scale on Religious Satire Memes and Muslim Youth Identity in Online Communities

Zakiyyah Wardatul Laini; Eti Efrina; Juni yanti; Syukri Amin; Fransiskus Novrianto Pakpahan

doi:10.59535/f0kyj446

Authors

Zakiyyah Wardatul Laini Department of Islamic Communication Broadcasting, Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu, Indonesia Author
Eti Efrina Department of Islamic Communication Broadcasting, Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu, Indonesia Author
Juni yanti Department of Islamic Communication Broadcasting, Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu, Indonesia Author
Syukri Amin Department of Islamic Communication Broadcasting, Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu, Indonesia Author
Fransiskus Novrianto Pakpahan Department of Management, Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59535/f0kyj446

Keywords:

Scale Development, Psychometric validation, Religious Satire Memes, Muslim Youth Identity, Online Communities

Abstract

The contemporary digital landscape has created new arenas for the negotiation of religious values, with internet memes serving as a dominant tool for social satire and critique. In this context, the present methodological study aims to develop and conduct an initial validation of a scale measuring exposure to religious satire memes, attitudes toward religion, and Muslim youth identity in online communities. Employing a quantitative approach, primary data were collected through a closed-ended online questionnaire administered to 200 respondents selected via purposive sampling from a population of 215 individuals. The psychometric evaluation focused on item validity using product–moment correlation analysis. Of the 27 statement items initially constructed, only 17 met the validity criterion (r-count > r-table 0.1388), whereas 10 items—including several within the Attitude toward Religion (SA) and Muslim Identity (IM) dimensions—were found to be invalid due to negative or near-zero correlation values. Given the substantive proportion of invalid items, the research was intentionally concluded at the validity testing stage to avoid generating misleading findings from a flawed measurement instrument. These results indicate that the current version of the scale cannot yet be used for hypothesis testing or inferential analysis regarding the relationships among the constructs. The primary implication is the need for systematic revision of the invalid items, potential reconceptualization of specific dimensions, and subsequent pilot testing to obtain a more robust and psychometrically sound instrument for future studies on religious satire memes and Muslim youth identity in online environments.

References

[1] I. Moschini, ‘Social semiotics and platform studies: an integrated perspective for the study of social media platforms’, Social Semiotics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 623–640, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504714.

[2] H. Mulyawati, ‘Between Taboo and Virtue: Islamohumorism in the Reconstruction of Muslim Identity and Piety through Social Media’, Islamic Studies Review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 275–298, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.56529/isr.v2i2.179.

[3] S. Sumin, H. Retnawati, and W. Sayadi, ‘Development and Validation of the Islamic Work Exemplary Scale in Indonesia’, Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.25217/0020236392000.

[4] A. S. Dewi and B. J. Sujibto, ‘Laughing at religious radicalism: How memes promote interfaith, multiculturalism and nationalism’, Simulacra, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 209–224, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.21107/sml.v7i2.27240.

[5] A. Asmiati, D. Atmaja, L. Mahmudah, A. Kholiq, and P. B. Widyanto, ‘The Role of MTs N 3 Surabaya City in Building Religious Moderation Culture: Analysis of Inclusive and Child-Friendly Education Models’, Jurnal Edusci, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–79, Sept. 2025, doi: 10.62885/edusci.v3i1.893.

[6] M. Nadeem and F. Ali, ‘Faith Under Fire: Online Hostility Toward Religious Minorities in Pakistan’s Digital News Spaces’, Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, vol. n/a, no. n/a, 2025, doi: 10.1111/sena.70002.

[7] M. R. Rifat et al., ‘The Politics of Fear and the Experience of Bangladeshi Religious Minority Communities Using Social Media Platforms’, Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 8, no. CSCW2, p. 387:1-387:32, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3686926.

[8] A. Yadlin-Segal, ‘Communicating Identity through Religious Internet Memes on the “Tweeting Orthodoxies” Facebook Page’, in Digital Judaism, Routledge, 2015.

[9] D. P. Pratama, ‘Islamic Fanaticism in Indonesia and Malaysia as Seen Through the Lens of Online Comics and Memes’, presented at the Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2019), Atlantis Press, May 2021, pp. 82–98. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210531.011.

[10] D. Sugiyono, ‘Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D’, 2013, Accessed: Mar. 31, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://digilib.unigres.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=43

[11] C. León-Mantero, J. C. Casas-Rosal, C. Pedrosa-Jesús, and A. Maz-Machado, ‘Measuring attitude towards mathematics using Likert scale surveys: The weighted average’, PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 10, p. e0239626, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239626.

[12] M. Ab. Wahab, A. Quazi, and D. Blackman, ‘Measuring and validating Islamic work value constructs: An empirical exploration using Malaysian samples’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 4194–4204, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.005.

[13] J. B. Hoesterey, ‘Nahdlatul Ulama’s “Funny Brigade”: Piety, Satire, and Indonesian Online Divides’, CyberOrient, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 85–118, 2021, doi: 10.1002/cyo2.8.

[14] L. Richter, ‘Laughing about Religious Authority—But Not Too Loud’, Religions, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 73, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/rel12020073.

[15] M. H. Nauval, ‘Funny Salafism: Reframing Orthodoxy for Global Engagement on Social Media’, DINIKA : Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, pp. 265–290, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.22515/dinika.v10i2.10972.

[16] T. H. Altahmazi, ‘Humorous but hateful: Linguistic impoliteness and visual dysphemism in anti-Muslim memes’, Internet Pragmatics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 219–248, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1075/ip.00106.alt.

[17] K. K. Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, 1999.

[18] C.-M. Hefner, ‘Morality, religious authority, and the digital edge’, American Ethnologist, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 359–373, 2022, doi: 10.1111/amet.13088.

[19] N. Issa and P. Tendera, ‘Factories of Banality: The Role of Works by Jeff Koons in the Art World’s Discourse of Wealth and Power’, IJACDT, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.4018/IJACDT.301969.